LP Conference: Delegate & Member power

As a result of arguements about the representative nature of hand votes within the CLP college at LP Conference, I did some sums and a chart. Here are my notes.
CLP’s get one delegate for the first 749 members, then one delegate/250 members, plus if they have 100 women, a women’s delegate and if they have 30 young people, they get an additional youth delegate.
This means that a CLP with 50 members will probably get two delegates, a CLP with 200 members will most probably get three delegates and a CLP with 750 members will almost certainly get four delegates.
The power of an indifiducal member is a function of the size of the CLP and the number of delegates. How much of a share in the decision to did the member have and how powerful is that decision?
I chose to represent this as:-

1 ÷ (members ÷ delegates) ≍ ( delegates ÷ members )

I then chose to represent this as a ratio of the maximum value in the range, so the power index maximum is 1.

This doesn’t tell us anything that wasn’t obvious, small CLPs are over represented in a show of hand vote. I assume,

  1. All CLPs send their maximum delegation, they don’t the larger CLPs can’t afford it. (3,500 members = 15 delegates).
  2. That the LP’s membership is 50%/50% men and women, which means Parties with under 200 members get no woman’s delegate.

The following explanations

  1. The plateau at (.5,100) & (.5,150) is caused  by the modelling that parties with under 200 members can’t get a women’s delegate, at 200 member’s Parties get the right to send a woman’s delegate.

A frequency distribution of size of CLPs would be useful to understand how important this is. (If 50% of the membership are in parties above 750 members and 50% below, then this is obviously significant).
Here’s the spreadsheet that makes the chart; member power at conference


Comment ( 1 )

  1. LP Conference and CLP delegate power – davelevy.info
    […] wrote an analysis of CLP voting power at Conference and published it on my wiki; small Parties are disproportionately powerful given their membership, […]

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close